
Massachusetts Lawmakers Prioritize Health Policy
Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.
The debate continues. As I said before, I think debate is good. And I don’t think there is necessarily a right or wrong here. Research
In a “Reading list” last month, I cited Kaestner’s and Khan’s recent NBER paper Medicare Part D and its Effect on the Use of Prescription
The figure below is from a National Institute for Health Care Management Expert Voices article by Eric Jensen and Lenny Mendonca of McKinsey & Company.
This suggests I’ve not made something clear. I’ll try again. Aaron Carroll said it well. A lot of it shows that people with private insurance do
Aaron Carroll has some wise words to keep in mind when interpreting studies of the Medicaid or uninsured populations: Insurance doesn’t equal care. Insurance can
Robert Pear’s article in the NY Times this weekend missed a key point about the Administration’s legal defense of the individual mandate, which hinges on
This post is part of a multi-post series on the filibuster in the U.S. Senate. An index to all other posts in the series, as
I’ve been away the last few days and trying to relax. Now that I’m catching up, I see Austin Frakt and Avik Roy are having
I’m looking for health savings accounts (HSAs) and consumer directed health plan (CDHP) literature reviews (and by “literature,” I mean peer-reviewed health services and health economics
Sometimes when I critique an element of a broader set of proposals or raise a question about some research it is mistaken for a wholesale
In a comment to my post on the “disruptive innovation” ideas of Christensen, Grossman, and Hwang, Uwe Reinhardt provided some insight that escaped my relatively less