• Exploring the Relationship Between Neighborhood Income and Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Izabela Sadej, MSW, is a policy analyst at Boston University School of Public Health. She tweets at @IzzySadej. 

    The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in most communities taking precautionary, sometimes mandatory, measures to reduce the risk of spreading and contracting the virus. Physical distancing, also known as social distancing, has been one of the primary strategies adopted by various states and localities as a prevention tool. This typically includes the closure of schools and businesses and “stay-at-home” orders.  

    Since the onset of the pandemic in March 2020, existing systemic health disparities and social inequities have been magnified. Evidence indicates that residents of low-income neighborhoods were less likely to stayathome in response to COVID-19 compared to higher-income communities. These communities carry an unequal disease burden with higher confirmed caseloads and mortality rates, alongside financial constraints that impact low-income workers the most, given less of an ability to work-from-home. Many essential businesses are staffed by predominantly low-wage workers forced to choose between risking their income and exposure to COVID-19. This increased inequity, which remains unaddressed by public policy, has led to further research. 

    New Research 

    A recent study published in Nature Human Behaviour expanded the current evidence base by investigating the relationship between neighborhood income and physical distancing patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The authors hypothesized that: 1) the gap in physical distancing practices would be explained by work demands and not by visits to non-work locations, and; 2) state policies that ordered the closure of non-essential businesses and “stay-at-home” orders would contribute to the gap in physical distancing practices between low- and high-income communities.  

    (Academic affiliations of the authors for this study include Boston University School of Public Health Departments of Community Health Sciences; Global Health; Health Law, Policy and Management; and Epidemiology.) 

    Methods 

    Using longitudinal mobility data derived from smartphones and previous Census data on neighborhood income, the physical distancing practices of low-income neighborhoods were compared to higher-income neighborhoods. This was done by identifying mobility patterns for work-related activities and visits to non-work locations (liquor stores, carryout restaurants, convenience stores, hospitals, parks, places of worship, supermarkets) and comparing patterns two months before and after March 2020. 

    A series of analyses were conducted to distinguish the use of smartphone mobility data. This information was collected through SafeGraph, with an average sample size of 19 million smartphone devices used per day throughout the nation, aggregated by U.S. Census Block Groups (BGs). The three main mobility patterns were measured as follows:  

    • “Staying at home” was determined by a smartphone user’s overnight location for most nights during the previous six weeks, with the device being observed within the home location and nowhere else on a given night 
    • “Working outside of the home” was observed through similar location tracking metrics as above and observing behavior consistent with full-time, part-time, or delivery work.  
    • “Visits to non-work activities” were observed through counting the number of visits to non-work locations listed above within BG income levels.  

    State-level social distancing policies were identified through a public database that tracked media coverage and verified government websites. To assess the impact of these policies on mobility, a differences-in-differences model was used to estimate how much physical distancing changed in each state after the implementation of a stay-at-home (SAH) order, calculated separately for each income quintile. This model allowed researchers to take advantage of the fact that states timed their SAH orders differently, if they implemented them at all. 

    Findings  

    Lower-income communities were found to increase physical distancing less than higher-income communities. There was no significant evidence that non-work activities contributed to these differences. Instead, differences were caused by lower-income community residents continuing to work outside of the home 

    Physical distancing orders were associated with increased physical distancing activity, though the magnitude of policy effect was modest at every income level compared to overall trends. Residents of all-income levels began physical distancing before the implementation of state orders, with pre-trends steepest at high-income levels. State policies did little to level the disparities in social distancing among income levels.  

    The primary limitation of this study is the inability to generalize the findings. Smart phone ownership and usage varies across sociodemographic groups, with the possibility that teens from higher income neighborhoods may have been over-represented in the sample. Additionally, SafeGraph data could have systematically miscounted the number of smartphone users staying at home or going to work due to irregular data collection intervals. Lastly, local jurisdictions and mandates were not considered when measuring the impact of state policies. 

    Conclusions  

    The results of this study and the impacts of COVID-19 emphasize the importance of incorporating social and economic factors into public health responses. Differences in physical distancing patterns based on income level were noticeable yet state policies did not close this gap. It is crucial for policymakers to consider how existing health disparities within certain communities may be exacerbated by new policies. Many unintended consequences can be anticipated and, thus, mitigated.  

    Simultaneously employing other policies alongside physical distancing mandates, such as eviction moratoriums, mandating paid sick leave, and extended unemployment insurance would allow lower-income communities to better protect themselves. A more equitable COVID-19 response would include widespread adoption of these measures, just like the adoption of non-essential business closures and stay-at-home orders.  

     
    front-page-item.php
  • Substance Use Disorder Treatment Centers: Uncovering Fraud and Advancing Policies to Promote Best Practices

    Register and mark your calendar for a webinar on fraud in substance use disorder treatment. (See details below.) The event is part of an Arnold Ventures-funded project that is a collaboration between Boston University School of Public Health and Faegre Drinker. Melissa Garrido is the project’s principle investigator and I am a co-investigator. Substance Use […]

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • Paid sick leave: just as important as paid family and medical leave

    Without a federal policy, it’s up to states or individual employers to decide to offer paid sick leave and how much; a move that could make income-based disparities (among others) even worse.

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • Cancer Journal: SHATTERED

    This journal is about being a cancer patient during the COVID epidemic. Last week I had a conversation with my doctor that shattered me. I have so much to say! But first, I need to convey what we have learned. After completing radiation therapy in September, I have steadily regained my health. I am working […]

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • The Importance of Diversity and Equity in Medicine and Research: Healthcare Triage Podcast

    In this episode, Dr. Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds and Dr. Sylk Sotto talk with Dr. Aaron Carroll about the importance of diversity and equity in research, higher education, and medicine. They share insights about underlying issues they’ve seen and talk about ways to encourage success for underrepresented minorities. This episode of the Healthcare Triage podcast is sponsored by Indiana University […]

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • *DEADLINE EXTENDED* | HSR Special Issue Call for Abstracts: Translating Research into Policy and Action

    The following is cross-posted on the Health Services Research website. Sponsored by: Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) & Quality Enhancement Initiative (QUERI), Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Submission deadline: April 30, 2021 May 12, 2021 Health Services Research (HSR) and the VA HSR&D QUERI program are partnering to publish a Special […]

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • The Facts About Vaccine Passports

    Vaccine passports are a big topic right now, even though “passport” might be the wrong word. We take a look at what they are and what they aren’t, and dig deeper into the concerns most commonly voiced about them.   @DrTiff_PhD

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • *REMINDER* | HSR Special Issue Call for Abstracts: Translating Research into Policy and Action

    The following is cross-posted on the Health Services Research website. Sponsored by: Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) & Quality Enhancement Initiative (QUERI), Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Submission deadline: April 30, 2021 Health Services Research (HSR) and the VA HSR&D QUERI program are partnering to publish a Special Issue on Translating […]

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • Blood Clots, FDA Approval, and the AstraZeneca Covid Vaccine

    There’s a lot of anxiety about the AstraZeneca vaccine thanks to recent reports of incomplete data, as well as reports on blood clot risks. Let’s take a look at both issues in context, understanding the efficacy data before and after numbers were updated, and understanding blood clot risk in relation to other common situations where […]

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
  • What’s Behind the Growth in Alcohol Consumption?

    A comparison across demographic groups over two decades offers some clues, and there has been a particular rise in misuse among women during the pandemic.

    Read More
     
    front-page-item.php
front-page.php