
Massachusetts Lawmakers Prioritize Health Policy
Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.
Click to enlarge and, oddly, to see it with better colors (no idea why that’s the case). Much more at NIHCM. Worth a look. @afrakt
I’ve been following the tussle in the blogosphere between Jon Chait (and to a lesser extent Ezra Klein) and others with respect to “caving” on
I’ve read all the arguments against (and for) raising the age of Medicare eligibility, but not this one: the ambition of universal coverage — or
Though I am confident our health care system could be more productive, I’m skeptical that productivity growth in the sector has been negative, as has
In Democracy, Henry Aaron argues that progressive should support (some) entitlement reform. With respect to Social Security, a few tweaks on revenue go a long
Yes, cost it money. Let me explain. If we drop 65 and 66-year-olds from Medicare, obviously that will mean the federal government is going to spend
I make the case for more prostate cancer comparative effectiveness research in a new post on the AcademyHealth blog. Check it out! @afrakt
Following up on my post on how raising the eligibility age for Medicare will make seniors pay more for it, let me also add that
There have been any number of articles focusing on states’ deciding whether to implement exchanges. I think many of them are forgetting the debate of
That’s from a new Commonwealth Fund report. @afrakt
Yep. It will. See, Medicare doesn’t work like your typical insurance company, which rates different people differently. It’s not making a profit, or advertising, or paying
Yesterday’s letter from HHS Secretary Sebelius was bland, but the attachment from CMS was more newsworthy. First, no more extensions on the deadlines. The Exchanges