The Incidental Economist

The health services research blog


  • About the blog
  • FAQ
  • Podcast archive
  • Site policies
  • TIE-U
  • Masthead

    Editors in Chief
    Austin Frakt twitter facebook email
    Aaron Carroll twitter facebook email

    Managing Editor
    Adrianna McIntyre twitter facebook email

    Contributors
    Kevin Outterson twitter email
    Bill Gardner Google+twitterfacebook email
    Nicholas Bagley twitterfacebook email
    Other Contributors
  • Recent posts

    • How Useful Are Temperature Screenings for Covid?
    • Veterans Experience Differences Between VHA and Community Providers
    • The Health Of The People Should Be The Supreme Law
    • What Can Be Learned From Differing Rates of Suicide Among Groups
    • At-Home Testing for Covid
    • Bias In, Bias Out
    • Come work with me (and colleagues you’ve read here)
    • Covid Vaccine Facts with the WHO’s Dr. Kate O’Brien
    • Nest Protect and the nuclear option
    • Religion and COVID: at odds?
  • Archives

  • For speaking inquiries


    Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?

    For information on Aaron speaking, click here.

    For information on Austin speaking, contact the Leigh Bureau.

  • Aaron’s stuff

    Selected appearances:
    The Colbert Report
    Good Morning America
    Sound Medicine (most recent)
    The Ed Show

  • Austin’s stuff

    Click here for links to Austin’s peer-reviewed publications and/or related posts.

  • Reflex: August 17, 2011

      08/17/2011
      Austin Frakt

    Our daily response to some health-related items in the news.

    Medicare reform: Obama vs. Ryan: Daniel Kessler and John Taylor argue in the WSJ that Ryan’s plan for Medicare is a better way forward than what Obama has proposed. In it they liken Ryan’s voucher plan to Medicare Part D and say that its advantages stem from a reliance on market prices. Comment: Actually, Ryan’s plan is not market-based enough in that it sets vouchers using an administrative, rather than a competitive process, as Part D does. Additionally, market-based need not preclude a public option (like FFS Medicare), which gets lower prices relative to plans in some areas due to market failures, chiefly high provider market power. 

    What if the mandate goes?: Matt Dobias of Politico warns that premiums would rise due to adverse selection. Comment: True, but only if nothing replaces the mandate. There are other options.

    Perry urges Americans to take “personal responsibility” on health care, taxes: Stephanie Condon of CBS reports that Rick Perry prefers Americans have more “skin in the game,” to take on more of the cost of health care. Comment: A concern is that individuals can’t distinguish between effective and ineffective care. They will cut back indiscriminately. Lower income individuals will cut back much more.

    (h/t Igor Volsky for flagging some of these stories.)

    Share this...
    Tweet about this on Twitter
    Twitter
    Share on Facebook
    Facebook
    Email this to someone
    email
     
      Health Policy
      reflex
    item.php
    • Comments (3)

    • by Steve Laniel on August 17th, 2011 at 11:59

      This is a terrific structure. I give my vote. Or “+1”, as the kids say.

      [top]
    • by George on August 17th, 2011 at 19:15

      Skin in the game would seem to make the biggest difference when the question is whether to tolerate discomfort/pain if there is a chance of improvement without expensive treatment and little risk of deterioration.
      An article in the Washington Post on comparative effectiveness research provides one example.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/comparative-effectiveness-research-tackles-medicines-unanswered-questions/2011/08/01/gIQA7RJSHJ_story.html

      [top]
    • by Zac on August 18th, 2011 at 19:38

      Surely the next segment to be added should be called the ‘TIE fighter’…?

      [top]

    • Follow the blog

      rss Google+ twitter facebook

      Why all these options?

    • TIE Books


      Bad Food Bible
      Amazon.com
      Barnes & Noble
      Indiebound
      iBooks
      Google
      Kobo


      Dont-Put-That-in-There
      Amazon.com
      Barnes & Noble
      Books-A-Million
      iBooks
      IndieBound
      Powells



      Buy at Amazon.com
      Summary

      Excerpt: Economic profit
      Excerpt: Diminishing marginal utility
      Excerpt: Four factors of production
      Excerpt: Monopoly marginal revenue
      Excerpt: Consumer/producer surplus


      Don't Cross Your Eyes!
      Amazon.com
      Barnes & Noble
      Books-A-Million
      Borders
      IndieBound
      Powells


      Don't Swallow Your Gum!
      Borders
      Barnes & Noble
      IndieBound
      Amazon.com
      Books-A-Million
      Powells

      Austin and Aaron are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
    • Tag cloud

      ACA AcademyHealth access accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement blogging cancer comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting COVID-19 employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs Healthcare Triage health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals individual mandate insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare Medicare Advantage mortality nutrition obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums prescription drugs quality reading list reflex RWJF spending uninsured Upshot vaccines
    Work posted here under copyright © of the authors.

    Details on the Site Policies page.

    © 2021 The Authors*