The Incidental Economist

The health services research blog


  • About the blog
  • FAQ
  • Podcast archive
  • Site policies
  • TIE-U
  • Masthead

    Editors in Chief
    Austin Frakt twitter facebook email
    Aaron Carroll twitter facebook email

    Managing Editor
    Adrianna McIntyre twitter facebook email

    Contributors
    Kevin Outterson twitter email
    Bill Gardner Google+twitterfacebook email
    Nicholas Bagley twitterfacebook email
    Other Contributors
  • Recent posts

    • The Infosphere as a SDOH: Leveraging Providers’ Influence to Counter Vaccine Misinformation
    • Dark Chocolate is not a Superfood
    • Cancer Journal: Ontario on the Edge
    • Vaccine Development, Covid-19, and mRNA vaccines
    • Incidents and Criticisms: Vaccine Backlash Part 2
    • Home cultivation of medical marijuana can result in higher hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to opioids
    • Healthcare Triage Podcast: Making Progress in Multiple Myeloma Research
    • The History of Vaccine Backlash Part 1
    • HSR Special Issue Call for Abstracts: Translating Research into Policy and Action
    • Cancer Journal: How to Live with Cancer
  • Archives

  • For speaking inquiries


    Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?

    For information on Aaron speaking, click here.

    For information on Austin speaking, contact the Leigh Bureau.

  • Aaron’s stuff

    Selected appearances:
    The Colbert Report
    Good Morning America
    Sound Medicine (most recent)
    The Ed Show

  • Austin’s stuff

    Click here for links to Austin’s peer-reviewed publications and/or related posts.

  • Losing weight won’t solve the health care cost crisis

      08/26/2011
      Kevin Outterson

    Research says: Obesity is a problem, but solving it doesn’t fix our health care spending problem, just a very small step in the right direction.

    After Aaron’s fat-laden post on the “food” at the Indiana State Fair, The Lancet released a thoughtful issue on obesity, including estimates that obesity-related health costs in the US will reach $28 billion in 2020.  Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M.  Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK.  The Lancet 2011;378:815-25 (gated). This sounds like a lot until you compare it to US NHE in 2020:

    Sources:  Wang YC, et al. Lancet 2011;378:815-25 ($28 billion); US NHE, 2020, table 1.

    More obesity news from The Lancet:  experts have underestimated how significant calorie reductions need to be in order to lose sustained weight.  The new models call for daily caloric reductions in range of 30 – 40% for very significant weight loss (ie, a 220 pound sedentary man reducing his 3000 calorie/day diet down to 1800 per day, in order to lose 44 pounds in 6 months).  Hall KD, Sachs G, Chandramohan D, Chow CC, Wang YC, Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA.  Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight.  The Lancet 2011;378:826-837 (gated).

    Bottom line:  very significant reductions in US caloric intake will save 0.6% of health care costs by 2020.

    Aaron’s 2010 posts (the blame du jour) and (I’m not saying obesity isn’t a problem) reached similar conclusions.

    UPDATE:  Sarah Kliff, writing over at Ezra’s place, covered the same studies. Everything she writes correctly reflects the articles. And yet, our posts are very different.

    Share this...
    Tweet about this on Twitter
    Twitter
    Share on Facebook
    Facebook
    Email this to someone
    email
     
      Economics, Health Policy
      health care costs, obesity
    item.php
    • Comments (2)

    • by Node Bunny on August 26th, 2011 at 14:26

      This article is ridiculous, sure actual obesity costs are probably a small fraction of overall health costs… but the larger costs come in the form of other health issues caused by obesity — diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc etc…

      [top]
    • by Kevin Outterson on August 26th, 2011 at 15:27

      First, go read The Lancet article. The prime contributors to their projected costs are increased CVD, diabetes, and cancers.

      [top]

    • Follow the blog

      rss Google+ twitter facebook

      Why all these options?

    • TIE Books


      Bad Food Bible
      Amazon.com
      Barnes & Noble
      Indiebound
      iBooks
      Google
      Kobo


      Dont-Put-That-in-There
      Amazon.com
      Barnes & Noble
      Books-A-Million
      iBooks
      IndieBound
      Powells



      Buy at Amazon.com
      Summary

      Excerpt: Economic profit
      Excerpt: Diminishing marginal utility
      Excerpt: Four factors of production
      Excerpt: Monopoly marginal revenue
      Excerpt: Consumer/producer surplus


      Don't Cross Your Eyes!
      Amazon.com
      Barnes & Noble
      Books-A-Million
      Borders
      IndieBound
      Powells


      Don't Swallow Your Gum!
      Borders
      Barnes & Noble
      IndieBound
      Amazon.com
      Books-A-Million
      Powells

      Austin and Aaron are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
    • Tag cloud

      ACA AcademyHealth access accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement blogging cancer comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting COVID-19 employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs Healthcare Triage health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare Medicare Advantage mortality nutrition obesity On The Record opioids physicians politics PPACA premiums prescription drugs quality reading list reflex RWJF spending uninsured Upshot vaccines
    Work posted here under copyright © of the authors.

    Details on the Site Policies page.

    © 2021 The Authors*