*Catastrophic Care*: Chapter 7
Perhaps the following passage from chapter 7 of Goldhill’s Catastrophic Care is worth a conversation. [H]ealth care experts attribute some of the rise in private insurance premiums
Perhaps the following passage from chapter 7 of Goldhill’s Catastrophic Care is worth a conversation. [H]ealth care experts attribute some of the rise in private insurance premiums
I was emailing with some journalist-friends about what reporters on policy or social science beats should really know. It’s unreasonable to expect reporters to have
He makes many good points I agree with while proving mine. I did not make any big mistakes in my post, but what if I
Children have been bullied since — well, since we’ve had childhood. There are now widespread movements to prevent school bullying. It’s clear that bullying was
That’s the title of a JAMA Viewpoint by David Shaw and Bernice Elger. The whole thing is worth a read (it’s ungated and short). Here’s
One thing I don’t do on this blog is provide a list of links to stuff I find interesting around the web. It’s just too
No, I haven’t forgotten about Goldhill’s Catastrophic Care. I’ve just been too busy doing and reading other things to maintain my prior pace of reading and posting
The study I wrote about earlier this week by Hadley et al. is just one of many to apply instrumental variables (IV) to analysis of cancer
I think I need a macro for posts like this one. But here’s the gist. I love information technology, but am skeptical about its “imminent”
There’s a really interesting post up by Peter Frase entitled, “The Perils of Wonkery”. He argues that we are relying, perhaps, too much on policy
The following, by Tyler Cowen, more or less makes a point I had made on Twitter. There is a genuine tension between becoming (and staying)