It would be easy if I just agreed with Paul Krugman about everything. But I don’t always.
Yet, sometimes I do. And he writes well. So instead of writing my own post about what I really think about the Cadillac tax I’ll just state (now for “the record”) that I think what he wrote makes a lot of sense. In brief, the tax’s general aim is good, but the specific way it is currently proposed is bad and should be fixed. (In truth this isn’t too different from what I’ve already strongly implied. Maybe Krugman is agreeing with me. He doesn’t always.)
The other thing I agree with Krugman about today is in his other post. Click through to find out. That’s the point.