The Incidental Economist

Contemplating health care with a focus on research, an eye on reform.


  • About the blog
  • FAQ
  • Podcast archive
  • Site policies
  • TIE-U
  • Authors

    Austin Frakt Google+ twitter facebook email
    Aaron Carroll twitter facebook email
    Kevin Outterson twitter facebook email
    Harold Pollack twitter facebook email
    Bill Gardner Google+ twitterfacebook email
    Other Contributors
  • Recent posts

    • Stuff like this makes me despair for cost containment at all
    • Financial incentives for quality – a review
    • Income redistribution and infant health
    • The outcomes associated with poor mental health
    • Universal coverage, value, and health system envy
    • It’s the policy that I doubt, not the beverages
    • You’re about to lose Google Reader. Now what?
    • MedPAC on Medicare plan competitive bidding
    • Puzzle
    • Want to be an innovator-in-residence?
  • Archives

  • For speaking inquiries


    Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?

    For information on Aaron speaking, click here.

    For information on Austin speaking, click here.

  • Aaron’s stuff

    Selected appearances:
    The Colbert Report
    Good Morning America
    Sound Medicine (most recent)
    The Ed Show

  • Austin’s stuff

    Click here for a link to Austin's CV, as well as a complete list of his peer-reviewed publications with links to related posts and/or ungated versions (when available).

  • Losing weight won’t solve the health care cost crisis

      2 comments
      August 26, 2011 at 11:04 am
      Kevin Outterson

    Research says: Obesity is a problem, but solving it doesn’t fix our health care spending problem, just a very small step in the right direction.

    After Aaron’s fat-laden post on the “food” at the Indiana State Fair, The Lancet released a thoughtful issue on obesity, including estimates that obesity-related health costs in the US will reach $28 billion in 2020.  Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M.  Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK.  The Lancet 2011;378:815-25 (gated). This sounds like a lot until you compare it to US NHE in 2020:

    Sources:  Wang YC, et al. Lancet 2011;378:815-25 ($28 billion); US NHE, 2020, table 1.

    More obesity news from The Lancet:  experts have underestimated how significant calorie reductions need to be in order to lose sustained weight.  The new models call for daily caloric reductions in range of 30 – 40% for very significant weight loss (ie, a 220 pound sedentary man reducing his 3000 calorie/day diet down to 1800 per day, in order to lose 44 pounds in 6 months).  Hall KD, Sachs G, Chandramohan D, Chow CC, Wang YC, Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA.  Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight.  The Lancet 2011;378:826-837 (gated).

    Bottom line:  very significant reductions in US caloric intake will save 0.6% of health care costs by 2020.

    Aaron’s 2010 posts (the blame du jour) and (I’m not saying obesity isn’t a problem) reached similar conclusions.

    UPDATE:  Sarah Kliff, writing over at Ezra’s place, covered the same studies. Everything she writes correctly reflects the articles. And yet, our posts are very different.

    TwitterFacebookDiggDeliciousStumbleUponShare
      2 comments on this post
     
      Economics, Health Policy
      health care costs, obesity
    • Comments (2)

    • by Node Bunny on August 26th, 2011 at 14:26

      This article is ridiculous, sure actual obesity costs are probably a small fraction of overall health costs… but the larger costs come in the form of other health issues caused by obesity — diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc etc…

      Reply

      [top]
    • by Kevin Outterson on August 26th, 2011 at 15:27

      First, go read The Lancet article. The prime contributors to their projected costs are increased CVD, diabetes, and cancers.

      Reply

      [top]

    Write a comment

    Click here to cancel reply.




    (Submission implies acceptance of comments policy.)

    Loading

  • Follow the blog

    rss Google+ twitter facebook facebook

    Why all these options?

  • TIE Books

    Don't Cross Your Eyes! Amazon.com
    Barnes & Noble
    Books-A-Million
    Borders
    IndieBound


    Don't Swallow Your Gum!
    Borders
    Barnes & Noble
    IndieBound
    Amazon.com
    Books-A-Million
  • Tag cloud

    AcademyHealth accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement antitrust blogging books comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting deficit employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals instrumental variables insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare mortality obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums premium support prescription drugs prostate cancer quality reading list reflex RWJF single payer spending substance use tax uninsured xkcd
Work posted here under copyright © of the authors.

Details on the Site Policies page.