Who will be uninsured in the future?

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s State Health Access Reform Evaluation program and the Urban Institute have a report out on who remains uninsured in Massachusetts, and Igor Volsky has a nice summary.  You may remember that Massachusetts enacted a form of health care reform years ago that is somewhat like the PPACA.  So by looking at who remains uninsured, we might get a clue as to who will remain uninsured nationally after 2014.

First of all, let’s recognize that Massachusetts had an uninsurance rate of 4.1% in 2008, which is much better than the national average of 15.1%.  Yes, it’s expensive, but I don’t think it was ever designed to contain costs (a flaw).  But who is this 4.1%?

Consistent with earlier work on the characteristics of uninsured adults in Massachusetts and in the nation as a whole, we find that the adults who remained uninsured under health reform in Massachusetts in 2008 were more likely than those with insurance coverage to be:

– Male, young, and single

– Racial/ethnic minorities and non-citizens

– Unable to speak English well or very well

– Living in a household in which there was no adult able to speak English well or very well

Compared with insured respondents, uninsured adults also reported substantially lower educational attainment and less employment and had lower family income and greater financial stress.

They make the logical argument that if you wanted to target people for interventions, you would look for younger, single, minority males, especially those who don’t speak English well or are non-citizens.  Good information to have, I guess.

But I’m not so sure that we will see entirely the same thing with the PPACA.  I’m taking a chance here, because what comes next seems so strange, I’m afraid I’m missing something.  If so, let me know.

The Kaiser Family Foundation has a nice subsidy calculator up that you can play with.  You enter information about your income and situation, and you get to see how much health insurance and care will cost you in 2014.

It’s not all good news.

Let’s say you are a 60 year old divorcee in 2014.  You make $46,136, which is 401% of the poverty line.  You are therefore eligible for NO subsidy from the government.  Your premium will be $10,162.  Should you actually need care, your out of-pocket costs will be capped at $6250.

So in a best case scenario, your health insurance/care will cost you 22% of your income.  In a bad year (or a regular year if you have a chronic illness) your health insurance/care will cost you 36% of your income.  Um… that’s not affordable.

Granted, the cost is so high that you would likely not be subject to the mandate.  Great.  So you continue to have the option to be uninsured.

I worry that the people who are going to be left out in the PPACA are those making just over 400% of the poverty line.  Because, ironically, if you make just a little bit less – say $45,906 (399% of the poverty line), then – due to subsidies – your premium will cost you $4361.  That’s less than 10% of your income.  And your out-of-pocket costs are capped at $4167.  So the most you could pay in a year would be 19% of income.

That’s still a lot.  But it’s WAY less than if you make just over the 400% line.

I have yet to see a good answer for what the government is going to do when people start asking for pay cuts to get under the 400% line.  I don’t see why it won’t happen.

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email

Hidden information below

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Format