The end of diet debates

I’d just post the whole thing if I could. “A Call for an End to the Diet Debates” (emphasis mine):

As the obesity epidemic persists, the time has come to end the pursuit of the “ideal” diet for weight loss and disease prevention. The dietary debate in the scientific community and reported in the media about the optimal macronutrient-focused weight loss diet sheds little light on the treatment of obesity and may mislead the public regarding proper weight management. Numerous randomized trials comparing diets differing in macronutrient compositions (eg, low-carbohydrate, low-fat, Mediterranean) have demonstrated differences in weight loss and metabolic risk factors that are small (ie, a mean difference of <1 kg) and inconsistent. In the past year alone, 4 meta-analyses of diet comparison studies have been published, each summarizing 13 to 24 trials. The only consistent finding among the trials is that adherence—the degree to which participants continued in the program or met program goals for diet and physical activity—was most strongly associated with weight loss and improvement in disease-related outcomes. The long history of trials showing very modest differences suggests that additional trials comparing diets varying in macronutrient content most likely will not produce findings that would significantly advance the science of obesity. Progress in obesity management will require greater understanding of the biological, behavioral, and environmental factors associated with adherence to lifestyle changes including both diet and physical activity.

Macronutrient content may influence dietary adherence via the satiating properties of protein, carbohydrates, and fat. However, dietary content is only one of many factors influencing adherence. The assumption that one diet is optimal for all persons is counterproductive because this assumption ignores the variation in adherence influenced by food preferences, cultural or regional traditions, food availability, and food intolerances. These are independent of direct physiological effects of macronutrient composition on weight loss. The most important question is how to improve behavioral adherence.

The authors believe there are two reasons people push specific diets. The first is commercial; if you can sell a specific diet, you can make a lot of money. The second is that lifestyle interventions are assumed to be ineffective. We want a quick fix, and we’re always sure it’s just out of reach.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. What works is very different from individual to individual. That’s important, because what works is what you can stick to. In other words, the specific diet isn’t as important as finding one to which you can adhere.

@aaronecarroll

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email

Hidden information below

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Format