The constitutionality of tort reform
Aaron Carroll August 3, 2012
I’ve written many times about tort reform and how it’s not a means of cost control. It turns out that it’s also not constitutional in
I’ve written many times about tort reform and how it’s not a means of cost control. It turns out that it’s also not constitutional in
As many of you know, I’m a frequent guest on Stand Up! with Pete Dominick on Sirius/XM radio. Another frequest guest, Prof. Eric Segall of
Paul Starr (who literally wrote the book on health care in America) has a thoughtful piece up about the individual mandate and health care reform.
A well-done video by NEJM (15 minutes), Jack Balkin (Yale) v. Ilya Somin (George Mason) on the constitutionality of the ACA, moderated by Wendy Mariner (BU).
I have an op-ed up at CNN.com on the individual mandate and how it relates to previous and future court challenges to the Affordable Care
UPDATE – the comments remind me to not assume you are lawyers. Translation below. Expect a tidal wave of amicus briefs for and against health
2 overlooked aspects of the President’s proposal: 1. The missing provision: In Title 26, Section 5000A, strike “penalty” in each place
Federal District Court Judge Connor issued the Goudy-Bachman opinion while I was teaching class. By now, you know the highlights; I’ll give you some solid
The 4th Circuit panel on the ACA litigation has ordered special briefing on the non-constitutional tax issue – if the individual mandate is a tax