The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has a nice overview of the two ways that Social Security is viewed (off budget v. unified budget). There is often so much energy spent arguing over which is the best way to view the program it deflects from reform discussions. The linked document is persuasive that it doesn’t matter which way you view it, reform is needed and the sooner we start the more options we will have.
Masthead
Editors in Chief
Austin Frakt
Aaron Carroll
Managing Editor
Adrianna McIntyre
Contributors
Kevin Outterson
Bill Gardner
Nicholas Bagley
Other ContributorsRecent posts
- Vaccine Development, Covid-19, and mRNA vaccines
- Incidents and Criticisms: Vaccine Backlash Part 2
- Home cultivation of medical marijuana can result in higher hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to opioids
- Healthcare Triage Podcast: Making Progress in Multiple Myeloma Research
- The History of Vaccine Backlash Part 1
- HSR Special Issue Call for Abstracts: Translating Research into Policy and Action
- Cancer Journal: How to Live with Cancer
- Unemployment Insurance Can Help Reduce Food Insecurity, the More Generous the Better
- Expanding health coverage is good. But we also need to fix stingy plans.
- Completely, 100%, removing, killing, disabling, and canceling Google Family Link
Archives
For speaking inquiries
Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?
For information on Aaron speaking, click here.
For information on Austin speaking, contact the Leigh Bureau.
Aaron’s stuff
Selected appearances:
The Colbert Report
Good Morning America
Sound Medicine (most recent)
The Ed ShowAustin’s stuff
Click here for links to Austin’s peer-reviewed publications and/or related posts.
Social Security Primer
03/27/2011
Don Taylor
item.php
Follow the blog
TIE Books
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Indiebound
iBooks
Google
Kobo
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Books-A-Million
iBooks
IndieBound
Powells
Buy at Amazon.com
Summary
Excerpt: Economic profit
Excerpt: Diminishing marginal utility
Excerpt: Four factors of production
Excerpt: Monopoly marginal revenue
Excerpt: Consumer/producer surplus
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Books-A-Million
Borders
IndieBound
Powells
Borders
Barnes & Noble
IndieBound
Amazon.com
Books-A-Million
Powells
Austin and Aaron are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.Tag cloud
ACA AcademyHealth access accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement blogging cancer comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting COVID-19 employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs Healthcare Triage health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare Medicare Advantage mortality nutrition obesity On The Record opioids physicians politics PPACA premiums prescription drugs quality reading list reflex RWJF spending uninsured Upshot vaccines
by Don Levit on March 28th, 2011 at 13:05
Don:
These 2 perspectives are known as the trust fund perspoective and the budget perspective.
If you woulkd like to contact me directly, I could provide some excerpts you may be interested in, from good third party sources, such as the Treasury.
Or, would it be appropriate to do so on this blog?
Don Levit
by Don Levit on March 29th, 2011 at 10:22
These 2 perspectives are illustrated well on Medicare Part D.
The trust fund perspective is always fully funded for it is assumed the Treasury will make good on all the trust fund “assets.”
In part D of Medicare, payments are 25% funded by participants and 75% by the federal government. There isn’t much of a trust fund needed, for the program is pay-as-you-go. Nevertheless, from the trust fund perspective, the benefits are fully funded. This is because it is assumed the Treasury will make good on their 75% (as well as the 25% for prticipants).
The budget perspective also makes that assumption, but accounts for it financially, in the budget. The 75% of general revenuies is an immediate expenses, and is reflected in the budget, thus increasing the deficits.
In the case of part D, I believe, the budget perspective is more objective and realistic.
Don Levit