A few commenters have questioned my power calculation on the Oregon Medicaid study, claiming different results. Though I can’t be sure what they are doing wrong
Is this really controversial? Evidently, some of you think it is. I was reading a Viewpoint in JAMA when I stumbled across this (emphasis mine):
Answering some questions about power calculations: 1) What is a power calculation? It’s a calculation that tells you, given sample sizes, assumed baseline risk, and
By Jennifer Schwartz and Steven Pearson in JAMA Internal Medicine: Methodological statements for clinical guidance documents indicated that 17 of 30 physician societies (57%) explicitly integrated
The recent debate over the work of Reinhart and Rogoff, as well as over the Oregon Medicaid study, offers a good opportunity to reflect on
A follow-up to this post is here. It includes instructions on how to run your own power calculations. Kevin Drum: Let’s do the math. In
This question is kicking around the blogosphere and Twitter. The current interest is inspired by the incorrect view that the latest Oregon Health Study paper
Highlights from this 2 day conference: Peter Barton Hutt, the dean of the FDA bar, on the last 50 years at the FDA. For example,
Wednesday’s New England Journal of Medicine article on the Oregon Medicaid lottery has provoked a firestorm of reaction. I’m not sure what I can add
This is a joint post by Austin Frakt and Aaron Carroll, part of our continuing coverage of the new Medicaid study. Tyler Cowen isn’t the
This is a joint post by Aaron Carroll and Austin Frakt. This is part of our continuing coverage of the new Oregon Medicaid study paper.
