• Bye-Bye Medicaid Asset Test*

      5 comments

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) goes a long way toward simplifying Medicaid eligibility. Go try and figure it out from the legislative language and you’re not likely to believe me. Fortunately, Joy Johnson Wilson, Health Policy Director for the National Conference of State Legislatures, has done the dirty work. In a handy document Wilson summarizes Medicaid and CHIP provisions in the new law and compares them to current law.

    In particular, on page 8 Wilson notes that the ACA “[r]equires states to use a net income standard (no asset or resource test, no income disregards) to determine [Medicaid] eligibility.” Yep, you read that right, bye-bye asset test. Hello simple income test. The new federal income eligibility threshold will be 133% of the federal poverty level (effective 1/1/14).

    Essentially, the Medicaid expansion under the ACA will broaden Medicaid eligibility for low-income, non-elderly adults without regard to assets. A major exception for that age group are those with incomes above the threshold but with high out-of-pocket medical costs. Such individuals will be required to spend their assets down to the existing asset limit, which varies by state and is typically a few thousand dollars.

    There are a few other caveats. Existing rules, including the asset tests, will continue to apply for individuals obtaining Medicaid eligibility through another program (e.g. foster care children, or SSI/SSDI recipients) and the elderly.

    Medicaid qualification just got a whole lot easier (or, rather, it will in 2014).

    TwitterFacebookDiggDeliciousStumbleUponShare
     
    • My jaw just hit the floor.

      I don’t understand the idea behind elimination of asset tests for assistance programs. Increasing allowable assets may make sense if your goal is to expand access, but eliminating it means that people who could afford to pay a reasonable premium don’t have to.

      The same problem exists with food stamps in New York, where it seems as though the asset test was eliminated in 2008. I haven’t been able to find anything explaining that decision either.

    • In response to Jay, we can assume that the great majority of people who earn less than 133% of poverty won’t have sufficient assets to support themselves. My wife and I were at about 133% of poverty and we DO have a significant amount of liquid assets, because of a settlement I was given from an auto accident. That’s definitely a rare case, though. And verification of assets is definitely an administrative hassle.

      • There are alot of people who claim to be under the 133% of the poverty level but work under the table or have additional cash paying jobs, These individuals can afford premiums but its just another loop hole this plan will create for people to take advantage of. There should always be a checks and balance for every program … it should never be to easy to get government provided benefits. Haven’t we learned our lesson with the welfare system and how many people take advantage of that every day.

    • a millionaire could be on medicaid and contribution to a ira could make a person quailify for medicaid

    Write a comment




    (Submission implies acceptance of comments policy.)