The Incidental Economist

The health services research blog


  • About the blog
  • FAQ
  • Podcast archive
  • Site policies
  • TIE-U
  • Masthead

    Editors in Chief
    Austin Frakt twitter facebook email
    Aaron Carroll twitter facebook email

    Managing Editor
    Adrianna McIntyre twitter facebook email

    Contributors
    Kevin Outterson twitter email
    Bill Gardner Google+twitterfacebook email
    Nicholas Bagley twitterfacebook email
    Other Contributors
  • Recent posts

    • Guns and Suicide Mortality
    • Beef Isn’t Great for the Environment
    • We Beat Sleep Apnea. It Should Be Easier for You to Do It, Too.
    • Has The Non-Profit Hospital Community Benefit Standard Been Successful Thus Far?
    • Samoa’s Devastating Measles Outbreak: An Antivax Story
    • What Makes A Non-Profit Hospital?
    • How to learn Mahler 5, 1st movement trumpet solos
    • Healthcare Triage Podcast: Diabetes During Pregnancy has Long Term Implications
    • Hypnic jerk (and a plantar fasciitis update)
    • Enforcing Work Requirements in Michigan is a Colossal Waste
  • Archives

  • For speaking inquiries


    Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?

    For information on Aaron speaking, click here.

    For information on Austin speaking, contact the Leigh Bureau.

  • Aaron’s stuff

    Selected appearances:
    The Colbert Report
    Good Morning America
    Sound Medicine (most recent)
    The Ed Show

  • Austin’s stuff

    Click here for links to Austin’s peer-reviewed publications and/or related posts.

  • What studies should I write about?

      July 4, 2017 at 9:04 am
      Austin Frakt

    From time to time I solicit suggestions on what to write about. Usually I solicit topics, but that often doesn’t generate very many ideas I can work with. The reason is that my writing isn’t driven by topics so much as studies.

    Of course, each piece is on a topic. But my entry is through the research. I start with a study that sparks an idea I think will resonate with people. That leads to other studies, and a post is born.

    With that, what studies do you think I should write about? Please send links or full enough citations so I can find them. You can reach me on Twitter, by email, or in the comments below, which are open for one week.

    @afrakt

    Share this...
    Tweet about this on Twitter
    Twitter
    Share on Facebook
    Facebook
    Email this to someone
    email
    Comments closed
     
      Uncategorized
      bleg
    • Comments (12)

    • by David States on July 4th, 2017 at 12:26

      Competition and prices in health care markets. Why are US prices so much higher than prices in other OECD countries?

      [top]
    • by Russ Abbott on July 4th, 2017 at 12:33

      You’ll probably get lots of references to this study since it’s been written about in so many places. Here’s one of them.

      https://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2017/07/human-microbiome-studies-really-are.html

      [top]
      • by Austin Frakt on July 5th, 2017 at 09:54

        Aaron has written about the microbiome: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/upshot/exciting-microbe-research-temper-that-giddy-feeling-in-your-gut.html

        If he didn’t hit this particular study, please reach out to him.

        [top]
    • by Eric Tremont on July 4th, 2017 at 13:58

      I would be interested in seeing your critique of the recently released study by Robert Pollin et al. on the California single payer proposal. Among other issues, I would like to know if you think their spending estimates are plausible. In particular, I am wondering if they have correctly applied estimates of the elasticity of demand (based on their literature review) when co-payments are significantly reduced for most patients.

      Thank you for your consideration.

      [top]
    • by oncodoc on July 4th, 2017 at 20:45

      This might be up your alley:
      http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1615069

      [top]
    • by David Anderson on July 5th, 2017 at 09:10

      This paper co-authored by one of my colleagues at Duke looks at the confusion inherent to buying health insurance as people anchor on “Gold” despite flipping the attributes of Gold to Bronze level plan design and premiums

      http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1414771?af=R&rss=currentIssue#t=article

      [top]
      • by Austin Frakt on July 5th, 2017 at 09:52

        I wrote about that one: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/02/upshot/why-consumers-often-err-in-choosing-health-plans.html

        [top]
    • by Jaso on July 5th, 2017 at 12:23

      Risk of death among users of Proton Pump Inhibitors: a longitudinal observational cohort study of United States veterans

      [top]
    • by Kimberly Dick on July 5th, 2017 at 16:34

      I don’t know if there have been any detailed studies on this, but given the Republican party’s desire to repeal the ACA, I would find it fascinating if you could find any work done to break down the lives saved by the ACA since its implementation: How many people? What are their demographics? What sorts of conditions do they have?

      [top]
    • by Sidney R. Finkel on July 5th, 2017 at 19:27

      Please, please write often and extensively on false positives and the probability analysis involved. I am an econometrician and I find that this is the single most mis-understood concept by the health care providers, including and especially physicians. Great harm is being done by the failure of the industry to understand the statistics associated with this topic.

      [top]
    • by Sidney R. Finkel on July 6th, 2017 at 19:20

      Also, the principles of insurance, why the individual mandate is necessary, why the employer mandate is necessary, how insurance works when there is risk spread among a large population. Ted Cruz and others are pushing insurance segmentation (see NYT Upshot), which is the opposite of good insurance policy. It’s like the people who know the least about how insurance works are the one’s setting the policy.

      [top]
    • by Margaret Mortz on July 7th, 2017 at 22:29

      http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/86816/2001044-high-premiums-in-nongroup-insurance-markets-identifying-causes-and-possible-remedies_2.pdf

      Sensible?

      [top]
    Loading

  • Follow the blog

    rss Google+ twitter facebook

    Why all these options?

  • TIE Books


    Dont-Put-That-in-There
    Amazon.com
    Barnes & Noble
    Indiebound
    iBooks
    Google
    Kobo


    Dont-Put-That-in-There
    Amazon.com
    Barnes & Noble
    Books-A-Million
    iBooks
    IndieBound
    Powells



    Buy at Amazon.com
    Summary

    Excerpt: Economic profit
    Excerpt: Diminishing marginal utility
    Excerpt: Four factors of production
    Excerpt: Monopoly marginal revenue
    Excerpt: Consumer/producer surplus


    Don't Cross Your Eyes!
    Amazon.com
    Barnes & Noble
    Books-A-Million
    Borders
    IndieBound
    Powells


    Don't Swallow Your Gum!
    Borders
    Barnes & Noble
    IndieBound
    Amazon.com
    Books-A-Million
    Powells

    Austin and Aaron are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
  • Tag cloud

    ACA AcademyHealth access accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement blogging cancer comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting deficit employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs Healthcare Triage health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals individual mandate insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare Medicare Advantage mortality nutrition obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums prescription drugs quality reading list reflex RWJF spending uninsured Upshot vaccines
Work posted here under copyright © of the authors.

Details on the Site Policies page.

© 2019 The Authors*