• Strangers don’t poison kids’ Halloween candy. It’s a myth.

    I’m going to make this a Halloween tradition, like I do with Thanksgiving and the turkey/sleepy myth. This is a chapter from our first book:

    As October draws to a close and children begin to pick their Halloween costumes and anticipate candy feasts, a barrage of child safety warnings begins. Among the most frightening for parents and children are the warnings to check candy carefully because of the risk of razor blades, poison, or similar frightening substances hidden within the candy. Who wouldn’t be paralyzed by worry that poison or a dangerous object has been placed in the candy and then randomly handed out to children by strangers? Parents carefully check each item of candy for any marks or tears in the packaging. Some families abandon neighborhood trick-or-treating all together and head to the mall. How afraid do we need to be about Halloween candy? Could this parental nightmare be a figment of our collective imagination?

    Why did we become so afraid of tampered Halloween candy in the first place? News reports of Halloween candy tampering have been popping up since 1950. In one story from 1964, a woman named Helen Pfeil was arrested for what she had considered an obvious joke – giving packages containing dog biscuits, steel wool pads, and ant poison buttons (labelled with the word “poison”) to teenagers who she considered too old to be trick-or-treating. Since she meant no malice, she made sure to also tell the teenagers about her “joke,” and therefore no one got hurt. Even so, she was charged and sentenced for “endangering children.” While she hardly sounds like a sinister stranger just waiting to give an unsuspecting child a poisoned treat, the case was used as an example of the dangers of Halloween candy in the media.

    Amazingly, despite the widespread fear of Halloween poisonings, no evidence of a genuine Halloween poisoning can be located. A professor of sociology and criminal justice at the University of Delaware, Dr. Joel Best, has tried to debunk this myth repeatedly. After scanning major newspapers between 1958 and 1993 for stories about Halloween candy tampering, Dr. Best found nearly 100 stories that he followed up with phone calls to police and hospitals. Of those stories, Dr. Best found absolutely none that could be positively attributed to random Halloween violence. The majority were the result of pranks. The reported incidents usually involved the discovery of contaminated treats, but with no actual injury to the children. When these cases were followed up, even the contamination usually turned out to be a hoax – often one initiated by the children themselves.

    In 1975, Newsweek magazine claimed that several children had died from Halloween candy-tampering in recent years. Surprisingly, this claim was not based on any actual events. In the only two documented cases of child deaths associated with Halloween candy, strangers were not to blame. Members of the child’s immediate family were intentionally or unintentionally responsible for the poisonings, and those responsible placed blame on random Halloween poisonings. In a case from Detroit, Michigan in 1970, 5-year-old Kevin Toston died four days into a coma that was later found to be caused by an overdose of heroin. Subsequently, heroin was found in his Halloween candy. A thorough investigation revealed that the heroin had not come from a stranger – it had come from his uncle’s obviously poorly hidden stash of heroin. When his family realized that they might be found guilty of neglect, they put some of the heroin in his candy in the hopes of covering up their part in his death. In 1974, 8-year-old Timothy Mark O’Bryan died as a result of consuming Pixie Stix® poisoned with cyanide after Halloween, a crime for which his father was subsequently convicted and executed. His father made use of the myth of Halloween poisonings to cover up his own actions. While these deaths are undeniably tragic, the real danger to the children involved came from their own homes, not faceless strangers.

    A 1990 case involved Ariel Katz, a 7-year-old girl who died while trick-or-treating, but her death was subsequently found to be due to congenital heart failure. In 2001, a 4-year-old in Vancouver died the day after trick-or-treating (resulting in police alerts to dispose of all Halloween candy), but the autopsy revealed that she died from an overwhelming bacterial infection (her candy wasn’t contaminated). Although both the website www.snopes.com and Dr. Best’s research have detailed these and other cases, and neither their searches nor ours revealed any evidence of actual random Halloween poisonings, this myth still persists. Tainted cupcakes will be blamed for adolescent abdominal pain, only to have the teenager later admit that he overdosed on prescription medications (this has actually happened). Reviews of the medical literature also fail to turn up evidence of random acts of Halloween violence. We cannot definitively prove that no child has ever been killed by a stranger poisoning their Halloween candy, but we can state that no such event has been documented in the media to the best of our knowledge.

    Of note, children do face some real health risks on Halloween, but the risks come from cars, not candy. The National Safety Council reports that children are at an increased risk of injury as pedestrians, being four times more likely to be killed by a car while walking around on Halloween than on any other night of the year. So, if you really want to keep your kids safe, focus on making sure they are visible to cars and are very careful about crossing the street, particularly as darkness falls.


    1. Best J. Threatened Children: Rhetoric and Concern About Child-Victims. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press; 1993.
    2. National Safety Council. Halloween. (Accessed 6 June 2007 at http:// www.nsc.org/LIBRARY/FACTS/HALLOWEEN.HTM).
    3. Halloween 1982: An Overview. In: National Confectioners Association, Chocolate Manufacturers Association, and National Candy Wholesalers Association.; 1982.
    4. Snopes.com. Halloween Poisonings. (Accessed 10 September 2007, at .
    5. Press finds Halloween sadism rare, but warns of danger. Editor and Publisher 1973;106:22.
    6. “The Goblins Will Getcha…” Newsweek 1975 3 November:28.
    7. Weir E. The hazards of Halloween. CMAJ 2000;163:1046.
    8. White SR, Dy G, Wilson JM. The case of the slandered Halloween cupcake: survival after massive pediatric procainamide overdose. Pediatr Emerg Care 2002;18:185-8.

    From Don’t Swallow Your Gum by Dr. Aaron E. Carroll and Dr. Rachel C. Vreeman. Copyright © 2009 by the authors and reprinted by permission of St. Martin’s Griffin.

    • “Of those stories, Dr. Best found absolutely none that could be positively attributed to random Halloween violence. The majority were the result of pranks.”

      Pranks can be dangerous. I always felt the risk was wildly overstated, but still am unable to draw a definitive final opinion.

      http://www.snopes.com/horrors/mayhem/needles.asp assessment True
      http://www.snopes.com/horrors/poison/halloween.asp assessment False

      This is the same website with two different answers. The former involved pins and needles while the latter poisoned goodies.

      Then again we all remember the Tylenol tampering.

    • This is a good tradition to start. And btw, I have both books, and they are terrific!

    • Right on, and it needs to be noted that child abuse is far more attributable to actions by family members and others, like teachers and preachers, known to the kid, than it is to strangers.

      Among kid and spouse abusers, the cops themselves are at the top of the list of worst abusers. So every kid should be counseled that, if threatened with abuse, he should call a stranger, not a cop, teacher, preacher or, worse, a parent.

    • Of course, a relevant consideration is whether the lack of cases is caused by the parents’ vigilance about it. The number of attacks could be endogenous here.

      • It’s *never* happened. Meanwhile, kids get hit by cars every year. Watch how many news stories and reports focus on the myths and ignore reality.

    • Great piece. Unfortunately, the evidence is that refuting a myth rarely causes people to abandon their belief in it (i.e. Obama isn’t a Muslim, etc.) . Better to affirm the truth than try to debunk the myth. So, maybe a better headline for your post each year should be “Parents, check your children’s costumes not their candy.”