Public opinion on competing approaches to health reform

Following on the heels of Austin’s post from yesterday, I’d like to share my contribution to JHPPL’s Affordable Care Act at 10 edition. Along with my coauthors (Bob Blendon, John Benson, Mary Findling, and Eric Schneider), I evaluated how preferences for different approaches to health reform relate to variations in underlying political attitudes and self-reported experiences with and judgment of the health care system. You can click through to a brief thread of highlights below, or download the full PDF (currently ungated)  here.

Adrianna (@onceuponA)

Adrianna McIntyre

Adrianna is an Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Politics in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Her research interests include the politics of health reform, barriers to take-up and retention of subsidized health insurance, and program evaluation for health policy.

Hidden information below

Adrianna McIntyre

Adrianna is an Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Politics in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Her research interests include the politics of health reform, barriers to take-up and retention of subsidized health insurance, and program evaluation for health policy.

The Incidental Economist

the health services research blog

Boston-area website management by BKJ Productions
Editors In Chief
Managing Editor

Work posted here under copyright © of the authors • Details on the Site Policies page

Subscribe

Email Address*