Mr. Smith need not go to Washington

Austin said [in an AcademyHealth interview] that it used to be that you communicated science to policy makers through a press release. Even more important, I think, was travelling to Washington for conversations with Congressional (or other governmental) staff. (One was taught to get your argument on a single sheet of paper, no one who mattered would ever turn a page.) What has emerged is a policy discourse process built on three electronic communication layers. There is the twitterverse, where journalists and widely read bloggers process events on a time scale of minutes and hours. A tweet, however, can serve as a headline for a linked blog post, where an academic or think tank blogger frames an argument in a few hundred words. A good academic blog post, in turn, will link to the academic literature, which is increasingly online (but unfortunately not that accessible, unless you have access rights at a university library). The net result, I think, is that more scientific evidence gets into elite discourse than when I started my university career in the 1980s, and it gets there faster.

That’s from the thoughtful mind of Bill Gardner. I set in bold the bit that I hadn’t considered before in this context. I travel to Washington to talk with policymakers approximately never. Yet, I have evidence that what I write (thus, think) is reaching (some of) them. My family is grateful for the additional time I’m home, as am I.

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email

Hidden information below

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Format