Let’s not forget Medicare is a good thing

It’s hard to focus on anything but the debt ceiling right now. It’s hard to talk about anything but costs, either. So it was nice to see this from Paul Krugman today:

The crucial thing to remember, when we talk about Medicare, is that our goal isn’t, or at least shouldn’t be, defined in terms of some arbitrary number. Our goal should be, instead, to give Americans the health care they need at a price the country can afford.

Hear, hear. I’m not saying the deficit isn’t important, or that costs shouldn’t be controlled. But we should remember our goal. It’s not just to save money, no matter what. It’s to provide more cost-effective care. There’s more:

While Medicare expenses per beneficiary have soared over the past 40 years, they’ve risen significantly less than private insurance premiums. And since Medicare-type systems in other advanced countries have much lower costs than the uniquely privatized U.S. system, there’s good reason to believe that Medicare reform can do a lot to control costs in the future.

In that case, you may ask, why didn’t the 2010 health care reform simply extend Medicare to cover everyone? The answer, of course, is political realism. Most health reformers I know would have supported Medicare for all if they had considered it politically feasible. But given the power of the insurance lobby and the knee-jerk opposition of many politicians to any expansion of government, they settled for what they thought they could actually get: near-universal coverage through a system of regulation and subsidies.

It is, however, one thing to accept a second-best system insuring those who currently lack coverage. Throwing millions of Americans off Medicare and pushing them into the arms of private insurers is another story.

Worth keeping in mind.

Hidden information below


Email Address*