Let’s Call It A Duck in Today’s House Tax Bill

Aaron’s post yesterday drew a lot of comments. The mandate is codified in the Internal Revenue Code, §5000a.  If it’s a tax, then it’s much more likely to be found constitutional.

Even better, the Tax Anti-injunction Act (26 USC §7421) forbids the filing of any case until after the tax is paid (in 2014).

As I said in my comment to Aaron’s post, Judge Hudson found it was a penalty rather than a tax.  Why?  Because Congress and the President sold it to the public as anything but a tax. The legislative findings [ACA §1501(a)] discuss the Commerce Clause power at length, but never mention the Taxing Power. 

How to fix this?  We need to call it a duck.  Add a single sentence to the tax bill in the House today, saying that Congress intended §1501 to be a tax rather than a penalty.

I’ll post next week on how the tax issue is likely to proceed on appeal to the 4th Circuit.

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email

Hidden information below

Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Format