When the Supreme Court granted King v. Burwell, I accepted an invitation from the Federalist Society to debate (again) the merits of the case with Jonathan Adler, one of the architects of the litigation. Not only is Jonathan a gracious sparring partner, but I thought it was worth explaining to a skeptical audience my view that, on the best reading of the ACA, tax credits are available in states that declined to establish their own exchanges.
A video from that debate has now been posted:
If nothing else, the debate offers a preview of the arguments that we’re likely to see on March 4, when the case will be argued at the Supreme Court.
@nicholas_bagley
