From two days ago in the Washington Post:
More than a year after Republicans first pledged to “repeal and replace” President Obama’s new health-care law, the GOP is still struggling to answer a basic question.
Replace it . . . with what?
Really? Shocked, shocked I am! There’s more:
If “repeal” is enough for the GOP primary, they said, then the details of “replace” should wait until later.
“You don’t want to be terribly detailed,” said Rep. Michael C. Burgess (R-Tex.), who advised McCain in his presidential run, and saw the details of his ideas turned into weapons by Obama. “It’s a whole lot easier to demagogue the ‘con’ than it is to defend the ‘pro.’ ”
You can go read the rest if you like. If you’re a regular reader of the blog, though, then none of it will be new to you.
AEC
