Dartmouth takedown fail

A Federal Reserve Board of Governors working paper circulating in D.C. is not what it seems. It is an apparent takedown of decades of Dartmouth research on geographic variation in health spending. It turns out that its dubious conclusions are due to a single methodological choice. You don’t want to miss my explanation in my latest AcademyHealth post, do you?

@afrakt

Austin Frakt

Austin Frakt, PhD, is co-Editor-in-Chief of The Incidental Economist. His day job is Associate Director of the Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center at the Boston VA Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. He is also a Principal Research Scientist with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Health Services Research.

Hidden information below

Austin Frakt

Austin Frakt, PhD, is co-Editor-in-Chief of The Incidental Economist. His day job is Associate Director of the Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center at the Boston VA Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. He is also a Principal Research Scientist with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Health Services Research.

The Incidental Economist

the health services research blog

WordPress Management: BKJ Productions
Editors In Chief
Content Manager

Work posted here under copyright © of the authors • Details on the Site Policies page

Subscribe

Email Address*