Association only, and the paper is ungated.
Masthead
Editors in Chief
Austin Frakt
Aaron Carroll
Managing Editor
Adrianna McIntyre
Contributors
Kevin Outterson
Bill Gardner
Nicholas Bagley
Other ContributorsRecent posts
- Cancer Journal: Ontario on the Edge
- Vaccine Development, Covid-19, and mRNA vaccines
- Incidents and Criticisms: Vaccine Backlash Part 2
- Home cultivation of medical marijuana can result in higher hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to opioids
- Healthcare Triage Podcast: Making Progress in Multiple Myeloma Research
- The History of Vaccine Backlash Part 1
- HSR Special Issue Call for Abstracts: Translating Research into Policy and Action
- Cancer Journal: How to Live with Cancer
- Unemployment Insurance Can Help Reduce Food Insecurity, the More Generous the Better
- Expanding health coverage is good. But we also need to fix stingy plans.
Archives
For speaking inquiries
Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?
For information on Aaron speaking, click here.
For information on Austin speaking, contact the Leigh Bureau.
Aaron’s stuff
Selected appearances:
The Colbert Report
Good Morning America
Sound Medicine (most recent)
The Ed ShowAustin’s stuff
Click here for links to Austin’s peer-reviewed publications and/or related posts.
Chart of the day: State legislation and firearm deaths
03/06/2013
Austin Frakt
item.php
Follow the blog
TIE Books
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Indiebound
iBooks
Google
Kobo
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Books-A-Million
iBooks
IndieBound
Powells
Buy at Amazon.com
Summary
Excerpt: Economic profit
Excerpt: Diminishing marginal utility
Excerpt: Four factors of production
Excerpt: Monopoly marginal revenue
Excerpt: Consumer/producer surplus
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Books-A-Million
Borders
IndieBound
Powells
Borders
Barnes & Noble
IndieBound
Amazon.com
Books-A-Million
Powells
Austin and Aaron are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.Tag cloud
ACA AcademyHealth access accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement blogging cancer comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting COVID-19 employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs Healthcare Triage health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare Medicare Advantage mortality nutrition obesity On The Record opioids physicians politics PPACA premiums prescription drugs quality reading list reflex RWJF spending uninsured Upshot vaccines
by joeyjojo on March 7th, 2013 at 13:32
From the abstract:
“States in the highest quartile of legislative strength (scores of ≥9) had a lower overall firearm fatality rate than those in the lowest quartile (scores of ≤2) (absolute rate difference, 6.64 deaths/100 000/y; age-adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.92). Compared with the quartile of states with the fewest laws, the quartile with the most laws had a lower firearm suicide rate (absolute rate difference, 6.25 deaths/100 000/y; IRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.83) and a lower firearm homicide rate (absolute rate difference, 0.40 deaths/100 000/y; IRR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95).”
It seems the highest quartile had 6.64 more gun deaths per 100,000 peron years than the lowest quartile. 6.25 per 100,000 of those deaths were gun-related suicides. 0.4 of the deaths were firearm homicides.
Haven’t read the full paper, but I’d be interested to see if non-firearm suicide rates were much higher in the lowest quartile. I guess if someone is going to attempt suicide, though, we’d rather they did it via non-firearms means, as they would then be more likely to survive the attempted suicide and potentially receive rehabilitative treatement to get them off the suicide path.
If N people attempt suicide via firearm, and N people attempt suicide via non-firearm methods, how will the survival rates compare?
by Floccina on March 11th, 2013 at 10:17
What we really need to look at are state legislation charted against total homicides and total suicides (also by race would be nice for obvious reasons). I would guess that there would still be a correlation especially with suicides but that it would be smaller. Charts like the above make me wonder why the source of chart ignored what would show a much more important relationship.