This week, a piece by Ben Smith has been making the rounds. It’s entitled, “Obama Prepares to Screw His Base.” How is he doing so? By making them pay more for health insurance. I respond in my latest piece at the AcademyHealth blog. Go read!
Masthead
Editors in Chief
Austin Frakt
Aaron Carroll
Managing Editor
Adrianna McIntyre
Contributors
Kevin Outterson
Bill Gardner
Nicholas Bagley
Other ContributorsRecent posts
- Variolation, Innoculation, and Vaccination: A History, Part I
- What can we expect from re-opening HealthCare.gov? Hope.
- The Rising Crisis of Underinsurance: How the Biden Administration May Shape Inequities in Patient Affordability
- How Genomics Improve Cancer Survival and Patient Quality of Life: The Healthcare Triage Podcast
- The End of Surprise Billing for Medical Care?
- Drug Prices by Committee: One Way Biden Could Lower Costs
- Recent publications from Boston University’s Department of Health Law, Policy and Management: February 2021 Edition
- Out-of-network payments in Medicare Advantage
- Cancer Journal: What is health?
- Should You Worry About Covid Vaccine Side Effects?
Archives
For speaking inquiries
Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?
For information on Aaron speaking, click here.
For information on Austin speaking, contact the Leigh Bureau.
Aaron’s stuff
Selected appearances:
The Colbert Report
Good Morning America
Sound Medicine (most recent)
The Ed ShowAustin’s stuff
Click here for links to Austin’s peer-reviewed publications and/or related posts.
AcademyHealth: Economists respond to Smith: “Uhm, that’s how insurance works”
02/11/2013
Aaron Carroll
item.php
Follow the blog
TIE Books
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Indiebound
iBooks
Google
Kobo
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Books-A-Million
iBooks
IndieBound
Powells
Buy at Amazon.com
Summary
Excerpt: Economic profit
Excerpt: Diminishing marginal utility
Excerpt: Four factors of production
Excerpt: Monopoly marginal revenue
Excerpt: Consumer/producer surplus
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
Books-A-Million
Borders
IndieBound
Powells
Borders
Barnes & Noble
IndieBound
Amazon.com
Books-A-Million
Powells
Austin and Aaron are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.Tag cloud
ACA AcademyHealth access accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement blogging cancer comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting COVID-19 employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs Healthcare Triage health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals individual mandate insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare Medicare Advantage mortality nutrition obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums prescription drugs quality reading list reflex RWJF spending uninsured Upshot vaccines
by JayB on February 12th, 2013 at 04:16
“That’s how insurance works”
You’d be on much stronger ground simply arguing that the redistribution from the young to the old mediated by the ACA is consistent with a particular vision of fairness that you endorse, rather than claiming that redistribution between groups of individuals that represent vastly different risks is a normative feature of insurance markets.
“Insurance” in which the premiums paid by a cohort of people are insufficient to cover the financial costs associated with the specific risks that they are underwriting against does not actually “work” in that eventually the aggregate value of the claims will eventually exceed the value of the assets that the insurer has accumulated to pay them.
Any attempt to use transfers from a low-risk cohort to subsidize the premiums of high risk cohort would quickly end for two reasons. Low risk clients would quickly flee to insurers offering better rates, and any insurer subsidizing high-risk clients would rapidly attract more high-risk clients, the excess claims from which would accelerate the insolvency brought about by the gap between the said claims and the funds that the insurance company had available to pay them.
This is why systematic transfers from low-risk cohorts to high risk cohorts aren’t evident in actual insurance markets that are allowed to operate in an actuarially sound manner – e.g. life, driver’s, liability, shipping, etc, etc, etc.
It’s redistribution from the young to the old, pure and simple. If you think that’s fair and ethical (and that’s a perfectly defensible stance), why not just come out and defend the said redistribution on ethical grounds instead of falsely claiming that “that’s how insurance works?”
by Billy Slug on February 12th, 2013 at 19:25
@JayB you mean adverse selection right.
Also isn’t that one of the things ACA is trying to minimize, i.e. by removing pre-existing conditions.
by Bob Hertz on February 13th, 2013 at 06:12
Both the original article and Mr Carroll’s comments are slightly off point, in this respect.
The fairest allocation of health costs is by income, not age.
A senior who is wealthy and a young person who is wealthy should pay more for health insurance.
A senior who is poor and a young person who is poor should pay less.
A tax-funded system like Canada accomplishes this with no fuss or debate.
The drafters of the ACA knew this, but they had to try and accomplish fairness in a very indirect left-handed way — through subsidies.
First they had to correct the insurance market itself by age ratios and banning underwriting.
That would lead to higher charges on young people, but that would be corrected by subsidies to young people with low incomes.
This whole arrangement is not precise and open to much gaming and requires constant enforcement.
Making insurance part of taxes is much simpler.
Bob Hertz, The Health Care Crusade