
Massachusetts Lawmakers Prioritize Health Policy
Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.

Massachusetts lawmakers made health policy their central focus of the 2025-2026 legislative session.
I’ve detested the “slippery slope” argument for as long as I can remember. And, I’m not just talking about disliking the argument when it is
Just a quick follow-up to my prior post on IV. I used a (flawed) treatment/control randomization as an example. My guess is that many people
The NBER working paper by Randall Morck and Bernard Yeung, “Economics, History and Causation,” has received some attention in the blososphere and in the comments on this
“Eliminating drug price differentials across government programmes in the USA,” by Kalipso Chalkidoua, Gerard Anderson, and Ruth Faden, explains why and how different US federal
By e-mail, Brad Flansbaum focused my mind on this question long enough for me to respond as follows. It seems right to me at the moment,
Source: http://xkcd.com/824/.
Changes In US Spending On Mental Health And Substance Abuse Treatment, 1986–2005, And Implications For Policy, by Tami L. Mark, Katharine R. Levit, Rita Vandivort-Warren,
Jon Cohn makes a point that seems so smart, I wish I’d thought of it first. If the individual mandate is so bad because –
“Simply put” is an ongoing series. See the introduction for an explanation of the series and the full list of topics that have been or may
I’m moving this conversation from the comments of another post to here. To help me, I’ll quote Igor Volsky, who sums up pretty much everything