Physics for health policy wonks
“Has everyone in here seen an integral? Good. Because I didn’t have a backup plan” — Ramamurti Shankar (Word document). This blog’s readership is undoubtedly dominated by
“Has everyone in here seen an integral? Good. Because I didn’t have a backup plan” — Ramamurti Shankar (Word document). This blog’s readership is undoubtedly dominated by
Yay! Yale just rolled out ten new, free, online courses. I’ve “taken” many classes from Yale this way and reviewed each one on this blog.
Economics is not physics, and that bothers some people. Such physics envy seems odd to me. It isn’t the fault of practitioners that economics models
We spend a lot of time thinking about food at my house. We read about food. In particular we are fond of Michael Pollan’s work
With Yale’s Astro 160 (Frontiers and Controversies in Astrophysics) I’ve now completed my first semester at Yale, so to speak. It’s the fifth class I’ve
God made mud. God got lonesome. So God said to some of the mud, “Sit up!” “See all I’ve made,” said God, “the hills, the
I learned of Ben Polak through his course Econ 159, available online through Open Yale Courses (see my review). In addition to being a superb
Psych 110, Introduction to Psychology, was the third Open Yale Course I listened to by podcast (others reviewed in posts listed under the Yale tag).
There’s a reason I’ve posted a lot on game theory of late: I was taking a course on the topic, continuing my education by podcast.
I’m always looking for high quality audio content to enjoy via podcast on my long commute by foot and rail. On the suggestion of Josh
the health services research blog
Work posted here under copyright © of the authors • Details on the Site Policies page