My piece at CNN.com on the choices available this election with respect to health care reform has gone up. Go read it, share it, tweet it, like it, and do whatever else with it that you like.
Authors
-
Recent posts
- The medical device tax needs to stay
- More comparative effectiveness goodness
- Fluoridation
- How to debate a wing nut
- Chart of the day: Cognitive ability and enrollment into public programs
- Cutting the budget for inspections of compounding pharmacies
- Sound Medicine: Why are employers offering health care incentives?
- “Body Ritual among the Nacirema”
- A conversation with Keith Humphreys on health reform, mental health, and substance abuse treatment
- Micro and macro totems
Archives
For speaking inquiries
Aaron’s stuff
Selected appearances:
The Colbert Report
Good Morning America
Sound Medicine (most recent)
The Ed Show
Austin’s stuff
Click here for a link to Austin's CV, as well as a complete list of his peer-reviewed publications with links to related posts and/or ungated versions (when available).
-
My quick summary of the choices available in health care reform
August 14, 2012 at 10:15 pm
Aaron CarrollWrite a comment
Follow the blog
TIE Books
Tag cloud
AcademyHealth accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement antitrust blogging books comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting deficit employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals instrumental variables insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare mortality obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums premium support prescription drugs prostate cancer quality reading list reflex RWJF single payer spending substance use tax uninsured xkcd
Loading
by Brad F on August 15th, 2012 at 07:14
Aaron
Curious. You did not draw a distinction between present MA–with the benchmark bidding, vs a more open system as proposed.
Putting the merits of competition aside, the difference can mean the difference between savings and not. You did not highlight that in the piece–and its an important distinction if one believes this approach may succeed.
Brad