The Incidental Economist

Contemplating health care with a focus on research, an eye on reform.


  • About the blog
  • FAQ
  • Podcast archive
  • Site policies
  • TIE-U
  • Authors

    Austin Frakt Google+ twitter facebook email
    Aaron Carroll twitter facebook email
    Kevin Outterson twitter facebook email
    Harold Pollack twitter facebook email
    Bill Gardner Google+ twitterfacebook email
    Other Contributors
  • Recent posts

    • A conversation with Keith Humphreys on health reform, mental health, and substance abuse treatment
    • Micro and macro totems
    • Bias, validity, and terminology
    • The sequester is hurting mental health research
    • Delinkage
    • Comparative Effectiveness at work (and a power dig)
    • Bias and the Oregon Medicaid study
    • “I am one of those who are very willing to be refuted”
    • Preventive mastectomies are good for some, not for others
    • The Oregon Experiment, Irrationality, and Universal Coverage
  • Archives

  • For speaking inquiries


    Interested in having Aaron or Austin speak to your group?

    For information on Aaron speaking, click here.

    For information on Austin speaking, click here.

  • Aaron’s stuff

    Selected appearances:
    The Colbert Report
    Good Morning America
    Sound Medicine (most recent)
    The Ed Show

  • Austin’s stuff

    Click here for a link to Austin's CV, as well as a complete list of his peer-reviewed publications with links to related posts and/or ungated versions (when available).

  • Health insurance is good for health [FAQ]

      0 comments
      July 5, 2011 at 12:00 pm
      Austin Frakt

    This is a FAQ entry. See the main FAQ index for others.

    • Health insurance saves lives, by Michael McWilliams
    • A second litereature review on health insurance and mortality
    • A post with links to others who argue that insurance saves lives
    • Health insurance is good for health
    • Studies show Medicaid improves health
    • Meanwhile, studies some interpret as showing Medicaid is bad for health are showing correlation, not causation
    • More Medicaid-health correlation, not causation
    • My NEJM paper, with Aaron Carroll, Harold Pollack, and Uwe Reinhardt on Medicaid and health
    • Medicaid expansion saved lives
    • Health insurance and health outcomes
    TwitterFacebookDiggDeliciousStumbleUponShare
      0 comments on this post
     
      Health Policy
      causation, correlation, FAQ, health insurance, Medicaid

    Write a comment

    Click here to cancel reply.




    (Submission implies acceptance of comments policy.)

    Loading

  • Follow the blog

    rss Google+ twitter facebook facebook

    Why all these options?

  • TIE Books

    Don't Cross Your Eyes! Amazon.com
    Barnes & Noble
    Books-A-Million
    Borders
    IndieBound


    Don't Swallow Your Gum!
    Borders
    Barnes & Noble
    IndieBound
    Amazon.com
    Books-A-Million
  • Tag cloud

    AcademyHealth accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement antitrust blogging books comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting deficit employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals instrumental variables insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare mortality obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums premium support prescription drugs prostate cancer quality reading list reflex RWJF single payer spending substance use tax uninsured xkcd
Work posted here under copyright © of the authors.

Details on the Site Policies page.