I have a new post up at the Academy Health Blog that highlights a recent HCCI report on health care spending on children in the last few years. It’s “Spending per child growing faster than all other age groups“, and you should go read it!
Authors
-
Recent posts
- Sound Medicine: Why are employers offering health care incentives?
- “Body Ritual among the Nacirema”
- A conversation with Keith Humphreys on health reform, mental health, and substance abuse treatment
- Micro and macro totems
- Bias, validity, and terminology
- The sequester is hurting mental health research
- Delinkage
- Comparative Effectiveness at work (and a power dig)
- Bias and the Oregon Medicaid study
- “I am one of those who are very willing to be refuted”
Archives
For speaking inquiries
Aaron’s stuff
Selected appearances:
The Colbert Report
Good Morning America
Sound Medicine (most recent)
The Ed Show
Austin’s stuff
Click here for a link to Austin's CV, as well as a complete list of his peer-reviewed publications with links to related posts and/or ungated versions (when available).
-
Health care spending on children is going up
July 11, 2012 at 10:32 am
Aaron CarrollWrite a comment
Follow the blog
TIE Books
Tag cloud
AcademyHealth accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement antitrust blogging books comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting deficit employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals instrumental variables insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare mortality obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums premium support prescription drugs prostate cancer quality reading list reflex RWJF single payer spending substance use tax uninsured xkcd
Loading

by Rick, RN on July 11th, 2012 at 11:50
I would have thought it would have been pharmaceuticals, but your commentary doesn’t support that. although generic adderal is more expensive than band. Would be interesting in breaking down the data by socialeconomic group since there is some data show middle class and higher families spend have higher rates of AHDH and Autism than lower class, but the correlation seems to be higher screening rates in middle and upper class families.
by Josh on July 11th, 2012 at 21:52
Has spending on children followed the expected track of overall per-capita health care spending from prior to the recession? My guess would be that slowdown in non-child spending has predominantly been because of the recession (as most health economists seem to agree) and the forgoing of care because of financial contraints. But, adults won’t limit their children’s care because of a scarcity of discretionary income. Thus, the thought is “my care is discretionary when times are tough, but not my child’s.”
by Sarah on July 11th, 2012 at 23:22
I remember reading about 6 months ago that children’s hospitals are often included in the “must have” list when it comes to insurers negotiating networks and provider contracts. Therefore the argument goes, insurers lack negotiating strength and so children’s hospitals are able to negotiate higher rates than general community hospitals.
I can’t find a link right now to what I remember, but maybe this article raises (or refutes?) that hypothesis. All I can read is the abstract so I’m not sure. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/5/973.abstract
The Kaiser News piece at least does not address what components of children’s medical expenses are contributing to the cost increases. It may not be hospital care anyway.
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2012/May/21/higher-health-care-prices-hospitals.aspx
by David Porter on July 12th, 2012 at 17:11
I can believe. Medical economics does not fit the capitalistic model. Competition increases cost. As you know here in Indianapolis we have competing children’s hospitals which results in duplication of services and therefore increase costs since both have offer expensive sub speciality care
I have no evidence but as a practicing pediatrician I see increase ER utilization with its attendant unnecessary testing which is increasing costs.
Your posts are terrific
David Porter