Authors
-
Recent posts
- A conversation with Keith Humphreys on health reform, mental health, and substance abuse treatment
- Micro and macro totems
- Bias, validity, and terminology
- The sequester is hurting mental health research
- Delinkage
- Comparative Effectiveness at work (and a power dig)
- Bias and the Oregon Medicaid study
- “I am one of those who are very willing to be refuted”
- Preventive mastectomies are good for some, not for others
- The Oregon Experiment, Irrationality, and Universal Coverage
Archives
For speaking inquiries
Aaron’s stuff
Austin’s stuff
-
Untitled
February 27, 2011 at 9:37 pm
Aaron CarrollWrite a comment
Follow the blog
TIE Books
Tag cloud
AcademyHealth accountable care organizations Affordable Care Act announcement antitrust blogging books comic competitive bidding costs cost shifting deficit employer-sponsored health insurance health care costs health insurance health insurance mandates health reform hospital readmissions hospitals instrumental variables insurance exchange market power Massachusetts Medicaid Medicare mortality obesity On The Record physicians politics PPACA premiums premium support prescription drugs prostate cancer quality reading list reflex RWJF single payer spending substance use tax uninsured xkcd
Loading
by Tom Rickets on April 12th, 2011 at 20:35
Hmmm, your data don’t quite match up with what I get from OECD, but just a little difference…and your eco-santé link is “subscriber only” so it’s not verifiable…Some of my French colleagues would argue that the “omnipraticiens” included in the second table would not be GPs…but DREES lists them that way:
Ensemble “Médecins libéraux et mixtes %)” “Femmes %)” Densité
Omnipraticiens 101,549 67.5 38.8 165
Spécialistes 106,642 50.2 38.8 173