<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bit More on Premium Increases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theincidentaleconomist.com/the-real-story-of-premium-increases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/the-real-story-of-premium-increases/</link>
	<description>Contemplating health care with a focus on research, an eye on reform.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AB</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/the-real-story-of-premium-increases/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>AB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=4813#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>Another great post. We need more people who are generally in favor of the Democratic health reform proposals calling out specious and unhelpful arguments from their own side. Too many people are choosing the low-hanging fruit of lying, disingenuous Republicans, a tactic that may be correct on its merits but basically unhelpful to the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post. We need more people who are generally in favor of the Democratic health reform proposals calling out specious and unhelpful arguments from their own side. Too many people are choosing the low-hanging fruit of lying, disingenuous Republicans, a tactic that may be correct on its merits but basically unhelpful to the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
