<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How (Not) To Spend a Bonus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/</link>
	<description>Economics, Health Policy, Law, Life: Musings of Curious Minds.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:42:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to think that I&#039;d just save all of it but in reality that rarely happens. Every time I find extra money, there are needs that arise that I wasn&#039;t aware of earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to think that I&#8217;d just save all of it but in reality that rarely happens. Every time I find extra money, there are needs that arise that I wasn&#8217;t aware of earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIE</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>TIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-226</guid>
		<description>@Joel - I agree. A proper accounting amortizes the cost over the duration of benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joel &#8211; I agree. A proper accounting amortizes the cost over the duration of benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Perhaps in buying, using and depreciating a durable good you are consumption smoothing? i.e. just because you buy a washing machine today doesn&#039;t mean you use up all its value...you consume its value over the life of the asset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps in buying, using and depreciating a durable good you are consumption smoothing? i.e. just because you buy a washing machine today doesn&#8217;t mean you use up all its value&#8230;you consume its value over the life of the asset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIE</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>TIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-216</guid>
		<description>@Rick - It is darn near impossible to say ex post whether or not you would have consumed in the same way without the bonus. That&#039;s why I was careful to write that I think I save most of a bonus. In practice I think it is unclear. I&#039;m now spending a lot after having received a bonus. But there are confounding factors (my wife is expanding her business, I need/want a new cell phone because my Palm died, etc.). Would I spend this way without the bonus or is the bonus making me feel richer so I spend more? Impossible to be sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rick &#8211; It is darn near impossible to say ex post whether or not you would have consumed in the same way without the bonus. That&#8217;s why I was careful to write that I think I save most of a bonus. In practice I think it is unclear. I&#8217;m now spending a lot after having received a bonus. But there are confounding factors (my wife is expanding her business, I need/want a new cell phone because my Palm died, etc.). Would I spend this way without the bonus or is the bonus making me feel richer so I spend more? Impossible to be sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wai Yip Tung</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Wai Yip Tung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Easy. I just throw the money into my home equity line. In my case it a big hole that&#039;s not going to be filled anytime soon. It has absolutely no impact on my consumption. Friedman&#039;s theory easily describe my behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy. I just throw the money into my home equity line. In my case it a big hole that&#8217;s not going to be filled anytime soon. It has absolutely no impact on my consumption. Friedman&#8217;s theory easily describe my behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Heck, I just went out and bought a power washer (man toy) with my bonus.. go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, I just went out and bought a power washer (man toy) with my bonus.. go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://theincidentaleconomist.com/how-not-to-spend-a-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theincidentaleconomist.com/?p=792#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Usually they are irrational. But you have to consider the possibility of getting hit by a truck; 
I mean, we only have a probabilistic idea of how long we will live. Looking backwards it&#039;s easy we should have spent XX then, saved YY then, etc. 

KInda like a bird in hand is better than two birds in a bush. Or at least that&#039;s the common psychological argument =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually they are irrational. But you have to consider the possibility of getting hit by a truck;<br />
I mean, we only have a probabilistic idea of how long we will live. Looking backwards it&#8217;s easy we should have spent XX then, saved YY then, etc. </p>
<p>KInda like a bird in hand is better than two birds in a bush. Or at least that&#8217;s the common psychological argument =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
